跳转到帖子

游客您好,欢迎来到黑客世界论坛!您可以在这里进行注册。

赤队小组-代号1949(原CHT攻防小组)在这个瞬息万变的网络时代,我们保持初心,创造最好的社区来共同交流网络技术。您可以在论坛获取黑客攻防技巧与知识,您也可以加入我们的Telegram交流群 共同实时探讨交流。论坛禁止各种广告,请注册用户查看我们的使用与隐私策略,谢谢您的配合。小组成员可以获取论坛隐藏内容!

TheHackerWorld官方

Microsoft Windows 10 - DSSVC DSOpenSharedFile Arbitrary File Delete Privilege Escalation

精选回复

发布于
Windows: DSSVC DSOpenSharedFile Arbitrary File Delete EoP
Platform: Windows 10 1803 and 1809.
Class: Elevation of Privilege
Security Boundary (per Windows Security Service Criteria): User boundary

NOTE: This is one of multiple issues I’m reporting in the same service. While I’ve tried to ensure all the bugs are effectively orthogonal from each other it’s possible that fixes for one thing might affect others. I’ve also not reported every possible problem with the service as at some point I had to stop. I’ve not determined if any of these issues could be abusable from a sandbox, most of the issues almost certainly can’t be due to the requirements for arbitrary file symlinks but it’s not impossible.

Summary: 

The Data Sharing Service DSOpenSharedFile method takes a flag to delete a shared file on close which can be abused to delete an arbitrary file.

Description:

The DSOpenSharedFile method takes a flag parameter where the file handle can be opened overlapped or for delete on close. The delete on close flag will set the flag FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE when opening the file with CreateFile. This code runs as SYSTEM so will open any file that that user has access to. However there’s a couple of issues with this:

1) The code doesn’t check that the file was shared writable, which means it’s possible to trivially specify a file to DSCreateSharedFileToken you want to delete and specify read only permissions. Then call DSOpenSharedFile with the delete on close flag, as the flag automatically adds the DELETE permission to the file open this will succeed even with the read-only mode set.
2) The DSOpenSharedFile relies on calling DSUtils::VerifyPathFromHandle prevent returning a handle which was redirected due to something like a symlink or directory junction. However by the time the code reaches the verification it’s already too late and the file will delete on close regardless of what the service now does.

While this bug relies on the same behavior as I reported for the arbitrary hardlink open issue (namely not impersonating the user when calling CreateFile) I think it should be treated separately, unless of course you decide to do the impersonation as a fix. At a minimum you should be checking that the file was shared writable in case 1, and perhaps you should open the file for DELETE in case 2, verify the path and only then delete the file by handle (using the native APIs).

Proof of Concept:

I’ve provided a PoC as a C# project. It will delete an arbitrary file that the user can read by abusing case 1 above.

1) Compile the C# project. It’ll need to pull NtApiDotNet from NuGet to build.
2) Execute the PoC passing the path to a file the user can’t delete on the command line (but can be deleted by SYSTEM).

Expected Result:
The call to DSOpenSharedFile fails and the file isn’t deleted.

Observed Result:
The file specified is deleted.


Proof of Concept:
https://github.com/offensive-security/exploitdb-bin-sploits/raw/master/bin-sploits/46158.zip
            

创建帐户或登录后发表意见

最近浏览 0

  • 没有会员查看此页面。